Our airport's expansion now costs twice as much and will finish four years late.
In 2021 the people you elect to the County Commission, sitting as the airport's board, approved a project to join RSW's three concourses behind one new security checkpoint. Two years in, the builder found the structure had been designed wrong. Here is what happened, who decided, who pays, and what it's doing to the price of flying out of Fort Myers.
This page follows the public record: the Port Authority's meeting minutes, its audited financial statements, its budgets, and the county's annual report. Where a detail comes only from news coverage, it says so.
The short version: an approved $331.6 million project became a $678.3 million one, the new checkpoint that was due before Thanksgiving 2024 is now on a contract running to 2029, and what airlines pay to use RSW has gone from among the lowest in Florida in 2024 to the second highest in 2025.
- Port Authority
- The county agency that runs RSW and Page Field. Its board is the County Commission.
- Phase 1
- The project that joins the concourses and builds one large checkpoint. The one that went over budget.
- Engineer of record
- The firm whose engineers sign off that the design is safe and correct.
- Cost per passenger
- What airlines pay the airport, on average, for each passenger who boards there. Not a ticket price.
01Who's in charge
Your County Commissioners are also the Port Commissioners.
There's no separate airport board to vote for. The same five commissioners who set your county budget also sit as the Board of Port Commissioners, which governs the Lee County Port Authority. That board hires the airport's executive director and approves every Phase 1 budget, contract and extension.
You elect
Five Lee County Commissioners
Hat one
Board of County Commissioners
County budget, roads, zoning, property tax.
Hat two
Board of Port Commissioners
Runs RSW and Page Field. Approves every Phase 1 budget and contract.
Which hires
The airport's Executive Director and staff
Who hire the firms that design, build and check the work. Tap one:
AtkinsRealis · Designer
- The job
- Engineer of record: the firm whose engineers sign off that the structure is safe and correct.
- How it was hired
- Ranked first for the terminal design in 2016. Florida law has engineers picked on qualifications, with the fee negotiated afterwards, so there was no price competition at selection.
- After the error
- Kept on Phase 1 and on the next, larger expansion (Concourse E). Gave a $3.3 million credit 'in good faith'. Its Phase 1 contract was extended in March 2025, and the legal deadline for claims against it was paused in May 2025. No settlement appears in the minutes through September 2026.
Source: M-160630, M-240516, M-250324, M-250508
An airport board is one of the least-watched jobs a county commissioner has. On the day this board doubled the budget, one member of the public spoke.
So what did that board approve in 2021?
02The plan
One checkpoint instead of three, done by early 2025.
In September 2021 the board approved a plan to join RSW's three concourses and move all security screening into one new 14-lane checkpoint. The budget was $331.6 million. Construction would start that fall and finish in early 2025, with the new checkpoint targeted before Thanksgiving 2024.
A sensible goal: one line instead of three, and a connected terminal behind it. Nothing on this page argues against the idea. It's about how it was built and who answered for it.
Construction started in fall 2021. By January 2023, staff told the board it was already behind schedule. Then it got worse.
03What went wrong
Two years into construction, they found a major problem with the design.
In September 2023 the builder, Manhattan Construction, found errors in the structural design: the plans for what holds the building up. An outside review it paid for listed 18 major design deficiencies.
According to the airport's executive director, as reported by the press, the steel columns had been designed for 110 mph winds. The building code required 167. Manhattan said the roof could collapse in a Category 5 hurricane. In Lee County, hurricane winds are not a hypothetical. Try it:
Category 4 hurricane
150 mph: beyond what the columns were designed for
That's 40 mph past the original column rating. The building code called for 167.
The airport's own audited statement put it plainly: the original budget was "significantly undervalued due to the design errors." Commissioner Hamman called it "a catastrophic mistake made by the engineer of record."
Fixing it meant going back into a building that was already up.
04The fix
Fixing it meant tearing out what was already built.
The repair plan strengthens 80 columns with carbon fiber and tears out and rebuilds some concrete walls and beams. The first 12 to 15 months of the restarted schedule were demolition. As reported, the redesign added 440 tons of steel and reworked nearly 2,000 fabricated parts.
About 1 in 5 steel parts redesigned
1,982 of 9,154 fabricated parts. Each square is about 100.
A quarter more steel
440 new tons on top of 1,693 (+26%).
- 80 columns wrapped in carbon fiber to strengthen them
- 66 existing trusses to modify
- Concrete walls and beams torn out and rebuilt
This is the expensive kind of mistake: one found after the steel is fabricated and standing, not on paper.
05Not only the designer
The builder made a mistake too.
In October 2023, a month after it flagged the design, Manhattan drilled into the reinforcing steel inside a concrete beam, according to Commissioner Mulicka. Manhattan wrote itself up for it. In February 2025 it was still unresolved.
The two firms traded letters; an executive at the designer replied that he was "gobsmacked." The airport told reporters all its buildings are safe.
Source: WGCU News, 21 Feb 2025 (press report).
“I'd say this whole thing is a terrible mess.”
06The wait
The board was told 60 days. It took 15 months.
Commissioner Greenwell said the board was first told a fix plan would take 60 days, then 90. It took about 15 months. Staff said the redesign "took longer than expected."
When the plan and its price finally reached the board in January 2025, commissioners balked and deferred it. While they weighed it, keeping the builder's contract going cost about $4 million a month.
- First told60 days
- Then told90 days
- What it tookabout 15 months
Put every date on one line and the schedule tells the story.
07The schedule
The finish line moved four years.
The plan was a three-year build. The builder's contract now runs to 31 March 2029. Tap any point on the line to read what the record says happened.
Sept 2023
The builder finds the design errors
Manhattan Construction discovers errors in the structural design. An outside review it paid for later lists 18 major design deficiencies.
Source: M-250324 · 3 of 13
- Plan / milestone
- Problem
- Board decision
- Money
The single checkpoint, the whole point of Phase 1, was supposed to open before Thanksgiving 2024. It is now on a contract that ends in 2029.
Four more years of a construction crew, a construction manager and inspectors is not free.
08The bill
The board doubled the budget.
On 24 March 2025 the board added $346.8 million, bringing Phase 1 to $678.3 million. It carried with no nays recorded. Commissioner Mulicka tied his motion to new oversight: staff changes, monthly reports from the firms, and notice whenever more than $100,000 of contingency is spent.
The increase is the most the airport may spend, not money already gone. It covers the demolition and rework, 44 more months of construction management, extended inspection, and reserve money the airport holds. No document splits out how much is the design error alone.
January 2021 estimate · Jan 2021$263.0M
Budget approved · Sept 2021$331.6M
Budget after the reset · Mar 2025$678.3M
June 2026: the money is running ahead of the clock
Construction budget billed77%
Schedule complete72%
The airport chose to keep the same designer, builder and inspector. Staff said starting over would cost about $500 million and take six to seven years.
09Who pays
No property tax pays for it. That doesn't make it free.
Officials have said on the record that "none of the money spent at the airport comes from taxpayers." That holds for local taxes: the airport's bonds are backed only by airport income.
But about 12% of Phase 1 is Florida DOT grants, which is state tax money. Another 23% is passenger facility charges, a fee on every ticket. And the biggest share is borrowed against what airlines, rental car companies and parking pay the airport. Tap a slice:
Airport revenue bonds$441.2 million · 65%
Borrowed from investors and repaid over decades out of airport income: what airlines, rental car companies, parking and concessions pay the airport. Backed only by that income, not by county property tax.
Most of this is borrowed. Which brings us to the airport's debt.
10The debt
The airport's debt more than doubled in one year.
Airport bonds outstanding went from about $374 million in September 2024 to $880.7 million in September 2025. Most of that increase paid for Concourse E, a separate, larger expansion. Then in March 2026 the airport sold $634 million more. About $250 million of that is for Phase 1.
Before the 2026 sale, the airport already owed $1.65 billion in principal and interest, with payments running to 2055.
A thinner cushion
The bonds require the airport's net income to cover its yearly loan payments at least 1.25 times. It still does, at 1.97, the lowest since 2020.
Rating agencies kept the airport's A ratings for the 2026 bonds, and analysts called the debt 'above average' but 'manageable'. But the cushion over yearly payments is thinner than it was, and it doesn't yet include the Phase 1 bonds.
11What airlines pay
Airlines now pay more at RSW than at Tampa or Orlando.
For years RSW sat mid-pack among Florida's eight commercial airports, and in 2024 it was the 3rd cheapest. A year later it was the 2nd most expensive, behind only Miami. Its figure rose 111% in one year, the biggest jump of the eight.
Press play, or drag through the years.
RSW was the 2nd most expensive of 8 Florida airports for airlines.
- RSWFort Myers (RSW)$13.05
- TampaTampa$12.78
- OrlandoOrlando$12.56
- Ft. LauderdaleFort Lauderdale$9.47
- Palm BeachPalm Beach$1.89
- SarasotaSarasota$7.80
- JacksonvilleJacksonville$10.25
- MiamiMiami$17.62
Be precise about the cause. The airport attributes the 2025 jump mainly to Concourse E debt under a new airline agreement, and the 2025 rate was set before the Phase 1 increase was approved. The Phase 1 overrun bonds were sold in March 2026, so they reach airline rates from 2026 on. Both expansions are paid from the same airport.
And the airport's own forecast keeps climbing.
12The airport's own number
The airport's goal was $8.50. It's proposing $16.64.
In 2021 the airport's stated objective was "maintaining a competitive" cost per passenger of $8.50 or less. Its adopted budget for this year and its proposed budget for next are both well past it. Terminal rent per square foot for airlines is proposed to go from $218.54 to $287.39.
13Why it matters to you
Bigger construction bills can mean bigger airline fees.
Airlines pay the airport to use RSW. Here is how a construction overrun travels from a budget vote to an airline's costs, with each link marked by how firmly the record shows it.
- In the record
The build costs more
Phase 1 went from $331.6 million to $678.3 million.
- In the record
The airport borrows
About two-thirds of Phase 1 is airport revenue bonds. About $250 million of the March 2026 bonds is for Phase 1.
- In the record
Yearly loan payments rise
Debt payments were projected at about $75 million in 2026, up 14.88%.
- Contract term
Airline rates must cover them
The airline agreement guarantees net revenue of 140% of debt payments. If it falls short, rates 'may be increased at the sole discretion of the Port Authority'.
- Our reasoning
Airlines set fares
Airlines usually pass airport costs on in ticket prices. Fares also depend on competition, and the record shows no airline citing RSW's rates.
When airlines pay more, who do you think they charge?
14At the terminal
Meanwhile, passengers wait.
The cost of a late project isn't only in the budget. It's in the terminal, every day the construction runs.
Three security lines, not one
The three old checkpoints stay open throughout construction. A temporary TSA checkpoint was scheduled for February 2026.
Source: M-250324, M-251106W
Food before security: two Dunkin's
Phase 1 closed main-terminal concessions in April 2025 and February 2026. Pre-security food is down to two Dunkin' locations and a grab-and-go kiosk.
Source: WGCU, 16 Apr 2025 and 28 Jan 2026
Detours and parking
Staff described detours through construction areas, and warned in May 2026 'there may come a time when there is no available parking' during the parking expansion.
Source: M-230119W, M-260507W
The first new space, in 2026
In May 2026 the executive director called 7,700 sq ft of TSA offices 'the first net-new space in Phase 1'.
Source: M-260507
15Still open
Three years later, we still don't know…
These are questions the public record doesn't answer yet. Each one is answerable, by a vote, an audit or a records release.
- 1
How much of the $346.8 million is the design error?
No document splits it into design error, delay, inflation or scope.
- 2
What will the designer pay?
Beyond the $3.3 million credit, no claim amount or settlement appears. The legal deadline has been paused since May 2025.
- 3
What did the reviews find?
Neither the builder's outside peer review (TRC) nor the airport's own Parsons reports is public. Parsons' were held for legal review.
- 4
Where is the audit?
The Clerk's Inspector General listed a Phase 1 audit in its 2025 plan and carried it into 2026. No report has been released.
- 5
When was the board first told?
The design error was found in September 2023. Its first explicit mention in the minutes is May 2024.
- 6
What changed in the airport's engineering department?
Staff reported 'significant changes' in November 2025. The minutes don't say what they were. No firing appears in the record.
The campaign's read
The board that approved it is the board overseeing the fix. So the public has to be the check.
Design errors happen. What turns one into a doubled budget and a four-year delay is a board that first takes it up in public eight months later, waits on 60-day promises for 15 months, keeps the same designer and inspector on the next, bigger project, and keeps the reviews out of public view.
I'd start with three things: release the Parsons and peer-review reports, finish the Inspector General's audit, and report to the public, in plain language, what the airport is recovering from the firms responsible. People who fly out of RSW are paying for this. They should be able to see the receipts.
